IT Risk Assessment Services & Gap Analysis in Dubai, UAE & USA
The risk register is a spreadsheet last updated in 2024. Everything on it is amber. Nobody owns any line, nothing has a date, and the one risk that actually materialised last year was never on it.
M365 Enterprise Hub delivers IT risk assessment services and gap analysis for organizations in Dubai, across the UAE and in the USA. We identify risks that reflect how your business actually operates, score them consistently, attach an owner and a date to each, and map the gaps to the standard you report against. See all our security services or call +971 50 743 7958.

What Are IT Risk Assessment Services?
IT risk assessment services identify what could go wrong across your technology estate, how likely each scenario is, what it would cost, and which controls currently reduce it. Gap analysis then compares those controls against a chosen standard — ISO 27001, NIST CSF, or a regulator’s requirements — and lists what is missing.
Done properly it produces a register the business can act on: scored consistently, owned by named people, with remediation dated and tracked. It pairs naturally with a security maturity assessment and feeds compliance services when certification is the goal. Control progress can be tracked in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, in a system you already own.
Risk Domains We Cover
Scope is agreed up front. Most engagements cover the three domains below, with regulatory scope added where it applies.
Technology & Cyber Risk
Identity, data, infrastructure, cloud and endpoint risks assessed against how your estate is actually configured.
Operational & Third-Party Risk
Key-person dependencies, supplier concentration, support arrangements and what happens when a critical vendor fails.
Compliance & Regulatory Gaps
Controls compared against ISO 27001, NIST CSF or UAE regulatory expectations, with each gap recorded and owned.

Why Most Risk Registers Stop Being Used
A register fails for predictable reasons: everything is scored amber because the scale has no written definitions, no line has an owner so nobody updates it, and remediation has no date so nothing is ever late. The fix is unglamorous — a scoring scale with criteria, a named owner per risk, a review cadence someone chairs, and a small number of risks rather than two hundred. Twenty live risks that get reviewed beat two hundred nobody opens.
Our Risk Management & Gap Analysis Services
Delivered as a fixed-scope engagement producing a working register and remediation plan, or as an ongoing function with quarterly review.
Risk Identification Workshops
Structured sessions with IT, operations and business owners to surface the risks that reflect how the organization really runs.
Scoring & Register Build
A scoring scale with written criteria, applied consistently, producing a register with named owners and review dates.
Control Gap Analysis
Existing controls mapped against ISO 27001, NIST CSF or regulatory requirements, with every gap recorded and evidenced.
Remediation Plan & Governance
Gaps sequenced into a costed plan, with a review forum and reporting pack so the register stays alive.
Risk Register Problems We Fix
These are the findings in almost every register we are handed.
- Everything scored amber: A scale with written criteria is applied so severity means something and ranking becomes possible.
- No owner on any line: Every risk is assigned to a named person with a review date they have agreed to.
- Remediation with no cost or date: Each gap gets effort, cost and a target date, so slippage becomes visible.
- Risks that do not reflect the business: Workshops with operational staff surface the dependencies only they know about.
Our Step-by-Step Risk Assessment Process
- Scoping: Domains, standard and risk appetite agreed with stakeholders before assessment begins.
- Identification: Workshops and technical review to surface risks across technology, operations and third parties.
- Scoring: Consistent scale applied with written criteria, producing a ranked and defensible register.
- Gap Analysis: Current controls mapped against the chosen standard, with each gap evidenced.
- Plan & Governance: Costed remediation plan, owners, review cadence and a reporting pack for the board.
A Static Register vs Managed Risk
Area
Static Register
Managed by M365 Enterprise Hub
Scoring
Everything amber, no written criteria
Defined scale applied consistently and defensibly
Ownership
Owned by the document, not by people
Named owner and agreed review date on every risk
Remediation
Actions with no cost, date or sequence
Costed plan sequenced by risk reduction per effort
Assurance
Nothing an auditor would accept as evidence
Evidenced control mapping to ISO 27001 or NIST

Why Choose M365 Enterprise Hub for Risk and Gap Analysis
Our consultants both assess risk and remediate it, so the register you receive is costed by people who know what the fixes actually take.
- A scoring scale with written criteria, so severity is defensible under challenge.
- Risks surfaced through workshops with operational staff, not only from a checklist.
- Gaps mapped to ISO 27001, NIST CSF and UAE regulatory expectations.
- Remediation costed by the engineers who would deliver it.
- Progress trackable in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager where you already own it.
- A register sized to be reviewed, with governance that keeps it current.
Ready for a Risk Register People Actually Use?
Request a free scoping call. We will agree domains and the standard you report against, and return a fixed-scope quote. We serve organizations in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah and across the UAE, and clients throughout the United States.
IT Risk Assessment FAQs
They identify what could go wrong across your technology estate, how likely each scenario is, what it would cost, and which controls reduce it. The output is a scored register with named owners, plus a gap analysis against the standard you report against.
Risk assessment asks what could harm the business and how badly. Gap analysis compares current controls against a standard such as ISO 27001 or NIST CSF and lists what is missing. They are usually delivered together because each makes the other actionable.
Fewer than most organizations expect. Twenty to thirty live risks that get reviewed beats two hundred nobody opens. Granular technical issues belong in a remediation backlog rather than the risk register.
Whichever you report against or intend to certify to. ISO 27001 if certification is the goal, NIST CSF for a broader capability view, or your regulator’s framework where one applies. Mapping to more than one is possible.
A full reassessment annually, with quarterly review of the live register and an out-of-cycle review after any significant incident or major change to the estate.
Yes, and the remediation plan is costed by the engineers who would do the work. You are equally free to take the plan to another partner or your own team.
Yes. We deliver IT risk assessment and gap analysis for clients across the United States as well as in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah and the wider UAE.